Resurrection as Revelation
In Corinth, resurrection functions as diagnostic and discipline—exposing rival wisdoms, restoring the value of bodies, and reforming community life by future hope.
Part 2 — 1 Corinthians: Resurrection as Diagnostic and Discipline
Claim: In 1 Corinthians, Paul treats the resurrection not as a late add-on but as the diagnostic center that exposes what kind of community the Corinthians are becoming—and the discipline that reforms their life together.
Corinth is a city obsessed with status, visibility, rhetorical brilliance, and competitive honor. The church has absorbed these values and baptized them as “spirituality.” Paul does not begin by policing behaviors. He begins by asking what story is shaping their imagination.
The Diagnostic Power of Resurrection
Paul repeatedly returns to one question: What kind of “wisdom” is actually shaping you?
- Factionalism and leader-branding (chs. 1–4)
- Sexual exploitation and lawsuits (chs. 5–6)
- Status disputes over food and freedom (chs. 8–10)
- Performative worship and gift-ranking (chs. 11–14)
- Confusion or denial of bodily resurrection (ch. 15)
- A cross-less definition of power
- A disposable view of bodies
- A present-only vision of success
- A spirituality disconnected from love
The resurrection exposes these distortions by reasserting God’s verdict on Jesus: the crucified one is the risen Lord. Any wisdom that cannot make sense of that verdict is, by definition, false.
Christ Mysticism Without God?
Thiselton, drawing on Moffatt, suggests the Corinthians had developed a "Christ mysticism which loosened the nexus between God and Christ." Surrounded by mystery cults devoted to Serapis and Asclepius, they appropriated a "Lord Jesus cult" mindset without sufficient reverence for the supreme God over the universe. Jesus had become their passionate focus—but God had drifted from view.
This may explain the strange phrase "I follow Christ" in 1:12, listed alongside faction-forming party slogans. Paul's response throughout: everything comes from God, through Christ, and God will be "all in all" (15:28).
Anchor Texts (LLT-SSE)
These anchor texts frame the entire letter: the community is God’s dwelling now, because resurrection life is already active among them.
Resurrection as Discipline: Reforming Community Life
If God raises the crucified Messiah, then boasting collapses. Leadership is not a ladder but a vocation of service. Resurrection discipline trains the community to stop competing and start building.
Bodily resurrection means bodies matter now. Sexual ethics, economic exploitation, and legal aggression are no longer private matters—they are questions about what kind of body the church is becoming.
Gifts are not markers of spiritual rank. They are tools for resurrection formation. Love is not an interruption to power—it is the power appropriate to a people destined for resurrection.
Paul’s climactic argument in chapter 15 does not merely comfort the grieving. It stabilizes the entire letter: because resurrection is coming, present labor, restraint, and faithfulness matter.
Why Paul insists on resurrection
Without resurrection, ethics collapse into pragmatism. With resurrection, faithfulness becomes reasonable—even when it looks foolish by Corinthian standards.
Chapter 15: The Crown of the Epistle
Many readers treat 1 Corinthians 15 as a theological appendix—a separate treatise on resurrection added to the practical concerns of the letter. Peppiatt, following Barth and Thiselton, argues the opposite: chapter 15 is the pinnacle of Paul's argument, the interpretive key that makes sense of everything before it.
1–11: Narratio — The resurrection of Christ: foundational creed
12–19: First Refutatio — The denial of resurrection exposed
20–28: First Confirmatio — Consequences of Christ's resurrection
29–34: Arguments from Christian experience
35–49: Second Refutatio — The resurrection body
50–57: Second Confirmatio — Victory over death
58: Peroratio — Conclusion for the Corinthians
The Problem Beneath the Problem
The Corinthians believed in Jesus' resurrection—but some denied the general resurrection of the dead. Peppiatt notes: "The key issue has to do with being pneumatikos. The Corinthians are convinced that by the gift of the Spirit, and especially the manifestation of tongues, they have already entered into the spiritual, 'heavenly' existence that is to be."
A Disposable View of Bodies
Gordon Fee observes: "Only the body, to be sloughed off at death, lies between them and their ultimate spirituality. Thus they have denied the body in the present, and have no use for it in the future." This explains why Paul addresses sexual ethics, eating practices, and bodily gifts alongside resurrection—they are all connected.
The Seed Metaphor: Continuity and Transformation
Paul's analogy of the seed (15:35–49) addresses both continuity and transformation. A seed that is planted dies—but what grows is recognizably connected to what was sown. The resurrection body is not a replacement but a transformation:
- Decay (corruption)
- Dishonor (ἀτιμία)
- Weakness
- A natural body (ψυχικόν)
- Immortality (incorruption)
- Glory (δόξα)
- Power
- A spiritual body (πνευματικόν)
This is not escape from the body but transformation of the body. The same Spirit who raised Christ from the dead is already at work in believers—and that work is not bypassing bodies but taking them up into Christ.
Honor-Shame and the Cross
Peppiatt emphasizes the honor-shame dynamics at play in Corinth. The city was a thriving Roman colony where honor was pursued through patronage, rhetorical brilliance, and public status. The church had absorbed these values.
- Patronage: Public giving, sponsoring buildings or statues
- Oratory: Rhetorical skill, philosophical reputation
- Connections: Association with high-status teachers
- Visibility: Spiritual gifts as status markers
Paul's message of a crucified Messiah was, by Corinthian standards, shameful. The resurrection does not erase that shame—it redefines it. God vindicates the crucified one, overturning the entire honor-shame calculus. This is why Paul can say: "God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong" (1:27).
Five Problems, One Gospel
The five sections of 1 Corinthians aren't random pastoral advice. Each addresses a different symptom, but Paul's response is always the same: the gospel of the crucified and risen Messiah.
Chs. 1–4: Divisions → The cross subverts status
Chs. 5–7: Sexual sin → Bodies will be raised
Chs. 8–10: Food disputes → Love denies itself
Chs. 11–14: Chaotic worship → Build up the body
Ch. 15: Resurrection denial → The foundation of everything
Why Resurrection Is the Climax
The BibleProject notes: "The resurrection was Jesus' victory over death and evil, it's a source of life and power for us now in the present, and it's a promise of future hope for the whole world. It's because of the resurrection that we have a reason to be unified around Jesus. It's the reason we have motivation for sexual integrity. It's the source of power for loving other people more than ourselves."
The Gospel Is Not Moral Advice
"The gospel is not just moral advice or a recipe for private spirituality. It's an announcement about Jesus that opens up a whole new reality. And that's what 1 Corinthians is all about—seeing every part of life through the lens of that gospel."
From Corinth to Pastoral Formation
In Corinth, resurrection exposes distortions and disciplines excess. In the Pastoral Letters, the same resurrection logic becomes formative—shaping leaders, teaching, and public credibility over time.
Continue to Part 3 →
Sources & Further Reading
Academic references for the 1 Corinthians resurrection study
Sources & Further Reading
Academic references for the 1 Corinthians resurrection study
Primary Commentaries
Theological Studies
Course Materials
Video Resources
Additional Resources
Note on Sources: This study draws primarily on Lucy Peppiatt's integration of Fee, Thiselton, and Barth to read 1 Corinthians as a unified argument with resurrection at its center—not as a collection of unrelated pastoral advice.
Citation Format: Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition